Rebel Threads
*Hannes Dünnebier's Artistic Anarchy
interview & written Alban E. Smajli
Hannes Dünnebier is redrawing the lines of reality. In his world, graphite whispers and cotton screams, creating a narrative that's less about creating and more about upending.
His journey? A plunge from the realms of large-scale drawings into the tactile embrace of textile. This isn't just a shift in medium; it's a manifesto, a defiant stride into the uncharted.
Hannes Dünnebier
Untitled, 2023
hand-stitched & hand-painted heeled boots, acrylic paint & varnish on raw cotton fabric, dimensions variable
.artist talk
Hannes Dünnebier
speaks with
Alban E. Smajli
As he navigates the intricate interplay of pencil and fabric, Dünnebier is stitching a new world order, thread by thread, line by line. With every piece, he questions, he defies, he redefines. His work is a mirror, a window, inviting us to step through and lose ourselves in a universe where the familiar is strange, and the strange, intimately familiar.
Hannes Dünnebier
Untitled, 2023
six pairs of hand-stitched & hand-painted, shoes, acrylic paint & varnish on raw cotton fabric, dimensions variable
Alban E. Smajli //
You've brilliantly used the medium of drawing to explore the challenges of human existence and its relationship with social norms, faith, and superstitions. How do you see the evolution of your artistic journey from large-scale graphite drawings to your recent textile works? And how do these two mediums connect and converse with each other in your practice?
Hannes Dünnebier //
Besides pencil and paper, I was always attracted to raw cotton fabric, that’s commonly used as the base for classic oil and acrylic painting. I looked for ways to incorporate it into my drawing practice, for example by sewing a fictitious drawing garment in which the graphite pencils are lined up in a cartridge belt.
Last year I moved to Antwerp to do a Masters at the Royal Academy of Fine Arts, which was a good place to further deepen my exploration of the raw cotton fabric and its interconnection with my drawing practice. One thing that has always particularly inspired me about drawing is that I can create complex works and an entire world with the simplest of means. I wanted to try to do the same with the fabric, which I first manipulated, to achieve different looks and feels and then hand-stitched into clothing and shoe-like objects.
I started by recreating a few pieces from my personal wardrobe, such as a sports jacket or trainers, and then added new, self-invented pieces such as high heels with a hand-painted crocodile skin pattern. I also made a shoulder bag, inspired by a random bag I found in a second-hand shop in Antwerp. For the graduation show I staged everything together in a room as a kind of extended self-portrait.
For me it’s a continuation of my drawing practice and I see the textile works as drawings themselves. The process of hand sewing plays an important role in this. Sewing a piece together stitch by stitch is similar to how I put my drawings together line by line. I guess that in the end my graphite drawings and my textile works all come from the same vague feeling – it just appears in different forms.
Congratulations on being awarded the Lyonel Kunstpreis. The jury mentioned your art offers "an immense interest in the familiar in the seemingly new." How do you interpret this? And how does the cyclical nature of old appearing in new forms manifest in your work?
Thank you! I think when creating an artwork, it’s a lot about the fusion of different existing things, into something new. References can be obvious, and used as a sort of quote, but sometimes it’s nice to keep it subtle and try to create a sense of familiarity that cannot be deciphered immediately. The balance between the known and the unknown, between the readable and the unreadable is something I encounter a lot when making art. It's about trying to carve out vagueness as clearly as possible - if that makes any sense.
The jury also highlighted the role of the human body in your work, both as a site of manipulation and a medium for self-expression. Can you elaborate on how you navigate this dichotomy and what inspired you to approach the body in such a unique manner?
This makes me think of one of my first projects in art school, where I designed furniture for specific body positions, that were all based on having really bad posture. My idea was to use the posture as a metaphor for the mental state of a person and manifest that in an entire interior setting. I always found it weird to have a body, that physically exists in space, and I am trying to make sense out of it by using its presence and its absence as means for my art. The first approach with the furniture has evolved with time but the core idea is still inherent in my work today.
In my graduation show at the Royal Academy, for example, all pieces originally scaled to a body (my body) were shown abandoned and inanimate, evoking a feeling of absence and emptiness. They were still tracing bodily presence and interaction, but also raised questions about their potential autonomous existence.
Hannes Dünnebier
Sorry not Sorry, 2023
hand-stitched and hand-painted shoulder bag, acrylic paint and varnish on raw cotton fabric, dimensions variable